Skip to content
  • About
  • Resources
  • Quick Exit
  • About
  • Resources
  • Quick Exit

Home

1
  • HIV Legal

Testing

8
  • HIV Testing
  • Voluntary Testing
  • Informed Consent
  • ‘Opt-out’ Testing
  • Point-of-care (Rapid) and home based HIV testing
  • Failure to follow up positive test results
  • Negligence – Failing to relay test results
  • Resources

Informed consent for HIV testing

1
  • Informed consent for HIV testing

Antenatal testing

1
  • Antenatal testing

Mandatory testing for HIV

1
  • Mandatory testing for HIV

Conveying test results

1
  • Conveying test results

HIV public health notifications requirements

8
  • ACT Specific
  • NSW Specific
  • NT Specific
  • QLD Specific
  • SA Specific
  • TAS Specific
  • VIC Specific
  • WA Specific

Contact tracing

9
  • Contact tracing
  • ACT Specific
  • NSW Specific
  • NT Specific
  • QLD Specific
  • SA Specific
  • TAS Specific
  • VIC Specific
  • WA Specific

Duty of care to third parties

4
  • Duty of care to third parties and civil liability
  • Duty of care to a sexual partner who is not a patient of the clinic: the case of BT v Oei
  • Duty of care to a sexual partner who is not a patient of the clinic: the Bondi case
  • Duty of care to patient and sexual partner who are patients of the same practice: the case of PD

Management of people with HIV who place others at risk

10
  • Management of people with HIV who place others at risk
  • ACT Specific
  • NSW Specific
  • NT Specific
  • QLD Specific
  • SA Specific
  • TAS Specific
  • VIC Specific
  • WA Specific
  • State-Based Information → Resources

Public health offences – reasonable precautions and duty to warn

9
  • Public health offences – reasonable precautions and duty to warn
  • ACT Specific
  • NSW Specific
  • NT Specific
  • QLD Specific
  • SA Specific
  • TAS Specific
  • VIC Specific
  • WA Specific

Privacy and confidentiality

19
  • Privacy and confidentiality
  • The My Health Record and privacy
  • Collecting information
  • Informing patients of how their information will be used
  • Notification
  • Accessing personal records
  • Security and storage of health information
  • When information can be used or disclosed
  • Information for teams
  • When information can be used or disclosed
  • Resources
  • ACT Specific
  • NSW Specific
  • NT Specific
  • QLD Specific
  • SA Specific
  • TAS Specific
  • VIC Specific
  • WA Specific

Low and undetectable viral load

1
  • Low and undetectable viral load

Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)

1
  • Post-Exposure Prophylaxis

Safe behaviours and disclosure

1
  • Safe behaviours and disclosure

Revisions and Updates

1
  • Revisions and updates
View Categories
  • Home
  • HIV Legal
  • Public health offences – reasonable precautions and duty to warn
  • QLD Specific

QLD Specific

Patient obligations  #

Section 66 of the Public Health Act 2005 (Qld) sets out guiding principles in relation to notifiable conditions. For the purposes of the Act, HIV is a controlled notifiable condition.

The guiding principles include:

  • A person at risk of acquiring HIV should take all reasonable precautions to avoid acquiring HIV
  • A person who suspects they have HIV should ascertain whether they have HIV and what precautions should be taken to prevents others from acquiring HIV.

Queensland’s Public Health Act 2005 (Qld) includes criminal offences for recklessly placing someone else at risk of acquiring HIV (and other controlled notifiable conditions) or of transmitting HIV (or other notifiable conditions).

Section 143 of the Public Health Act 2005 (Qld) states that a person must not recklessly put someone else at risk of acquiring a controlled notifiable condition.

If a person is found guilty of this offence, they may be subject to a penalty of up to 200 penalty units or up to 18 months’ imprisonment.

Further, a person must not recklessly transmit a controlled notifiable condition to someone else. Failure to comply attracts a penalty of up to 400 penalty units or 2 years’ imprisonment.

A defence is available if the other person knew that the person had HIV, and voluntarily accepted the risk of acquiring HIV.

In Zaburoni v The Queen [2016] HCA 12, Justices Kiefel, Bell and Keane describe the term ‘recklessness’ as it applies in Queensland and this particular offence context as: a state of mind in which a person adverts to the risk that particular conduct may result in particular harm and, with that awareness, engages in that conduct. A person may be more or less reckless depending upon the person’s awareness of the likelihood of the risk materialising.

Healthcare provider obligations (pre-contact tracing) #

Not defined.

Updated on 8 November 2024

Share This Article :

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
NT SpecificSA Specific
Table of Contents
  • Patient obligations 
  • Healthcare provider obligations (pre-contact tracing)

All rights reserved